Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1216
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorREG.NO.II0219001-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-24T14:40:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-24T14:40:18Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1216-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Adult patients seeking orthodontic treatment have increased significantly in the last decade. Inspite of the emergence of Invisalign, a large group of adult patients still favor ceramic brackets as choice for esthetic orthodontic treatment. With the increase in age, patients may require certain crowns and dental restorations in addition to orthodontic therapy. With the emergence of CAD/CAM in dentistry, single tooth crown restorations may now be made both chairside and in the lab. So, it has become very important for orthodontist to find a proper bonding protocol which gives optimal bond strength to bond metal and ceramic brackets to the newer CAD/CAM materials. The aim of the study was to to evaluate the SBS of monocrystalline and polycrystalline ceramic brackets on different CAD/CAM materials using two different bonding agents.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavien_US
dc.subjectShear bond strength, TransbondXT, Universal Single bond, Polycrystalline brackets, Monocrystalline brackets, CAD/CAM materialsen_US
dc.titleComparative Evaluation Of Shear Bond Strength Of Monocrystalline And Polycrystalline Ceramic Brackets Using Two Different Bonding Systems On Two Different Cad/Cam Materials : An In-Vitro Studyen_US
dc.typeDissertationsen_US
Appears in Collections:Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
REG.NO.II0219001.pdf1.47 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.