Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1330
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorREGNO. BJ0119014-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-28T15:34:04Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-28T15:34:04Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1330-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Induction of labor is one of the common interventions in obstetric practice, and the epidemiology of induction of labor has changed over the years, with increase in frequency of induction of labor. This study is based on a quantitative assessment of blood loss which occurs in induced and spontaneous vaginal deliveries using a calibrated pelvic drape to objectively measure postpartum blood loss. Objectives • To find out the association if exists between postpartum blood loss and induced labor. • Prevalence of PPH (>500ml) in induced Vs spontaneous delivery.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavien_US
dc.subjectInduction of labor, Postpartum blood loss, Postpartum hemorrhageen_US
dc.titlePost-Partum Blood Loss In Induced Vs Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery” – A Descriptive Observational Studyen_US
dc.typeDissertationsen_US
Appears in Collections:Obstetrics & Gynaecology MS

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
REG. NO. BJ0119014.pdf4.58 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.