Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1463
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorREG.NO. IF0220002-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-05T05:22:41Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-05T05:22:41Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-05-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1463-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Mandibular third molars are the most commonly impacted teeth and their surgical removal is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Most of the available literature supports the use of corticosteroids to reduce the post-operative sequelae of lower third molar surgery, namely pain, swelling and trismus, but there is not much evidence found in literature to determine if it is effective when used topically as an intraoperative irrigating solution during surgical removal of lower third molar. The present study is deliberated to assess the effect of irrigation with three different irrigants, namely normal saline, hydrocortisone and povidone iodine in post operative outcomes and complications like pain, swelling and trismus after surgical extraction of mandibular third molars.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavien_US
dc.subjectHydrocortisone, Mandibular third molar, Normal saline, Povidone iodine.en_US
dc.titleComparative evaluation of the efficacy of Hydrocortisone, povidone-iodine and normal saline as an Irrigating solution during surgical removal of impacted Mandibular third molars a Randomized control trialen_US
dc.typeDissertationsen_US
Appears in Collections:Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
REG.NO. – IF0220002 (OS).pdf9.4 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.