Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1721Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | REG NO: BA0121011 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-24T12:04:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-04-24T12:04:16Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1721 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | CONTEXT: Spinal anaesthesia is the most popular method for anaesthesia in lower segment cesarean section surgeries. There are fewer direct studies contrasting hyperbaric ropivacaine and hyperbaric levobupivacaine, hence we took this study. AIMS: Comparison of onset of action of sensory and motor block and the duration of action of hyperbaric levobupivacaine and hyperbaric ropivacaine and to compare hemodynamic effects of drugs. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi | en_US |
| dc.subject | Spinal anaesthesia, Ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, hemodynamic | en_US |
| dc.title | A comparative evaluation of hemodynamic Effects between hyperbaric ropivacaine and Hyperbaric levobupivacaine in elective lscs under Spinal anaesthesia; a one year randomized Controlled trial | en_US |
| dc.type | Dissertations | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Anaesthesiology | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BA0121011.pdf | 3.22 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.