Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1726
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorREG NO:BA0121015-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-24T14:16:32Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-24T14:16:32Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1726-
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study compares the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided erector spinae block (ESP) and paravertebral block (PVB) for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. Aims: To compare the analgesic efficacy of ESP and PVB by measuring the duration of block and total amount of rescue analgesic utilized in the first 24hours using Visual Analogue scale (VAS).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavien_US
dc.subjectErector spinae plane block, Paravertebral block, Ultrasound, Ropivacaine, Dexmedetomidine, Visual Analogue scaleen_US
dc.titleComparative Evaluation of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Block and Ultrasound-Guided Paravertebral Block in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgeries under Spinal Anaesthesia: A One-Year Randomized Controlled Study.en_US
dc.typeDissertationsen_US
Appears in Collections:Anaesthesiology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
BA0121015.pdf3.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.