Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1764Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | REG NO.: BT0121005 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-25T12:13:45Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-04-25T12:13:45Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1764 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acne scars result from changes in the skin's healing process triggered by inflammation, where atrophic scars show signs of inflammatory cell infiltration. Treatments range from surgery to less invasive methods like laser therapy. Newer technologies like MNRF and fractional CO2 laser are quicker and safer. MNRF and PRP or PRF offer a combined approach, stimulating collagen production and aiding in wound healing. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of MNRF with PRP versus PRF in treating acne scars, aiming to improve scar management | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi | en_US |
| dc.title | A split face comparative interventional study to compare the effectiveness of microneedling radiofrequency followed by platelet rich plasma vs microneedling radiofrequency followed by injectable platelet rich fibrin in post acne scars | en_US |
| dc.type | Dissertations | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Dermatology, Venereology & Leprosy MD | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BT0121005.pdf | 4.13 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.