Inguinal hernioplasty using bio component mesh (polyester monofilament and polylactic acid) vs. Polypropylene mesh: a one year randomized control study

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1789

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	REG. NO: BH0121004	-
dc.date.accessioned	2025-04-27T07:59:52Z	-
dc.date.available	2025-04-27T07:59:52Z	-
dc.date.issued	2024	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1789	-
dc.description.abstract	ABSTRACT Background: Inguinal hernia repair is a prevalent surgical procedure, and advancements in mesh materials and fixation techniques aim to optimize patient outcomes by reducing operative time, postoperative pain, and complications. This study aims to compare the outcomes of self-adhesive bio-component mesh (Polyester Monofilament and Polylactic Acid) Vs. a traditional polypropylene mesh fixed with sutures in inguinal hernia repair.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.publisher	KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi	en_US
dc.subject	Inguinal hernia, hernioplasty, self-adhesive mesh, polypropylene mesh, postoperative pain.	en_US
dc.title	Inguinal hernioplasty using bio component mesh (polyester monofilament and polylactic acid) vs. Polypropylene mesh: a one year randomized control study	en_US
dc.type	Dissertations	en_US
Appears in Collections:	General Surgery MS

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
BH0121004.pdf		5.05 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open