Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1803
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorREG NO: BH0121018-
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-27T08:14:14Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-27T08:14:14Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1803-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Minimally invasive techniques have revolutionized hernia repair, offering advantages such as reduced blood loss, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stays compared to open surgery. The conventional laparoscopic approach (lap IPOM) for ventral hernias, while effective, can lead to complications like high postoperative pain and fibrous adhesions due to intra-abdominal mesh fixation. In contrast, the Extended Totally Extraperitoneal Repair (eTEP) has gained popularity for its potential to minimize complications and improve long-term outcomes. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes, specifically postoperative pain and functional recovery, between eTEP and lap IPOM techniques for umbilical hernia repair in an Indian population.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavien_US
dc.subjectUmbilical hernia, laparoscopic surgery, eTEP, IPOM+, minimally invasive surgery, postoperative pain.en_US
dc.titleExtended totally extraperitoneal repair (etep) vs conventional laparosccopic repair with defect closure (ipom plus) for umblical hernias in dr. Prabhakar kore charitable hospital for a period of 1 yearen_US
dc.typeDissertationsen_US
Appears in Collections:General Surgery MS

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
BH0121018.pdf3.81 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.