Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1803Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | REG NO: BH0121018 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-27T08:14:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-04-27T08:14:14Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1803 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Minimally invasive techniques have revolutionized hernia repair, offering advantages such as reduced blood loss, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stays compared to open surgery. The conventional laparoscopic approach (lap IPOM) for ventral hernias, while effective, can lead to complications like high postoperative pain and fibrous adhesions due to intra-abdominal mesh fixation. In contrast, the Extended Totally Extraperitoneal Repair (eTEP) has gained popularity for its potential to minimize complications and improve long-term outcomes. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes, specifically postoperative pain and functional recovery, between eTEP and lap IPOM techniques for umbilical hernia repair in an Indian population. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi | en_US |
| dc.subject | Umbilical hernia, laparoscopic surgery, eTEP, IPOM+, minimally invasive surgery, postoperative pain. | en_US |
| dc.title | Extended totally extraperitoneal repair (etep) vs conventional laparosccopic repair with defect closure (ipom plus) for umblical hernias in dr. Prabhakar kore charitable hospital for a period of 1 year | en_US |
| dc.type | Dissertations | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | General Surgery MS | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BH0121018.pdf | 3.81 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.