Comparison between lma protector and igel for oropharyngeal leak pressure in adult patients posted for laproscopic surgeries- one year hospital based randomised control trial.

Abstract

CONTEXT- Endotracheal intubation was considered as the only way of establishing a definitive airway. But it has its own complications such as laryngeal trauma, stressor response causing elevated pressures, etc. Invention of supraglotic airway devices (SAD) provide alternative airway, without hazards of direct laryngoscopy and intubation. Its advantages include easy insertion, minimal hemodynamic changes, hands free maintenance, and lesser airway morbidity with relatively secure airway. Igel is a second-generation SAD made of thermoplastic elastomer non inflatable gel like cuff to create a seal with the peri laryngeal structures and avoid compression trauma. LMA Protector is a recently introduced, second-generation SAD with inflatable cuff, two gastric drainage tubes along with a lumen to pass an ET tube. AIMS- To compare Oropharyngeal leak pressure of Igel (Group I) vs LMA Protector (Group P) in patients posted for laparoscopic surgeries. To compare Insertion time and Ease of insertion in the above mentioned groups.