An open label non-randomized split face interventional study to compare the efficacy and safety of microneedling with azelaic acid 10% gel versus microneedling with tranexamic acid 5% gel in the treatment of melasma.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2063

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	REG N0: BT0122002	-
dc.date.accessioned	2026-01-13T06:46:38Z	-
dc.date.available	2026-01-13T06:46:38Z	-
dc.date.issued	2025	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2063	-
dc.description.abstract	PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of microneedling with azelaic acid 10 % gel versus microneedling with tranexamic acid 5% gel in the treatment of melasma. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: 1. To compare the safety of microneedling with azelaic acid 10 % gel versus microneedling with tranexamic acid 5% gel in the treatment of melasma. 2. To assess and compare Melasma Quality of Life (MelasQoL) score at the beginning and at end of the study.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.publisher	KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi	en_US
dc.title	An open label non-randomized split face interventional study to compare the efficacy and safety of microneedling with azelaic acid 10% gel versus microneedling with tranexamic acid 5% gel in the treatment of melasma.	en_US
dc.type	Dissertations	en_US
Appears in Collections:	Dermatology, Venereology & Leprosy MD

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
BT0122002.pdf		3.12 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open