Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2091
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorREG NO:BH0122004-
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-14T10:58:57Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-14T10:58:57Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2091-
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT Background: Umbilical hernias are frequently encountered in clinical practice, necessitating effective surgical management to prevent complications such as incarceration and strangulation. Laparoscopic techniques, including Trans-Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPPu-plus) repair and Intra-Peritoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM-plus) repair, are widely used for their minimally invasive advantages. While IPOM-plus is associated with shorter operative times, TAPPu-plus has been proposed to reduce postoperative pain, minimize intra-abdominal adhesions, and lead to faster recovery. This study aims to compare these two techniques in small-sized umbilical hernias, assessing their impact on operative time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and complications.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherKLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavien_US
dc.subjectUmbilical hernia, laparoscopic surgery, TAPPu, IPOM+, minimally invasive surgery, postoperative painen_US
dc.titleA randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (tappu-plus) repair vs laparoscopic intra-peritoneal onlay mesh (ipom-plus) repair for small-sized umbilical hernias at a tertiary care hospitalen_US
dc.typeDissertationsen_US
Appears in Collections:General Surgery MS

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
BH0122004.pdf4.26 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.