Evaluation of efficacy and safety of dilapan-s vs dinoprostone gel for ripening of cervix prior to induction of labour – a randomised control trial.

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2113

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	REG NO:BJ0122009	-
dc.date.accessioned	2026-02-25T10:25:06Z	-
dc.date.available	2026-02-25T10:25:06Z	-
dc.date.issued	2025	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2113	-
dc.description.abstract	Objective: To determine the efficacy of synthetic osmotic cervical dilator (DILAPAN-S) vs Dinoprostone vaginal gel for cervical ripening in induction of labour. Background: IOL(Induction of labour) is a common obstetric intervention aimed at initiating labor when continuation of pregnancy poses maternal or fetal risks. This randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of synthetic osmotic cervical dilator (DILAPAN-S) compared to dinoprostone vaginal gel for cervical ripening in term pregnancies	en_US
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.publisher	KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi	en_US
dc.subject	Cervical ripening, labor induction, DILAPAN-S, dinoprostone, maternal and neonatal outcomes	en_US
dc.title	Evaluation of efficacy and safety of dilapan-s vs dinoprostone gel for ripening of cervix prior to induction of labour – a randomised control trial.	en_US
dc.type	Dissertations	en_US
Appears in Collections:	Obstetrics & Gynaecology MS

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
BJ0122009.pdf		5.34 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open