Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/249
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDr.Naren Mandalapu, BH0118010-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-17T11:24:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-17T11:24:45Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/249-
dc.description.abstractThe importance of a proper technique in closing the port sites in laparoscopic surgery is well established, and to prevent complications, fascial closure is recommended for ports of size more than 10 mm. This study compared the post-operative port site complications (pain, surgical site infection, and hernia), after the fascial closure of 10 mm port sites with an absorbable multifilament suture (VicrylTM) and a non-absorbable monofilament suture (ProleneTM) using spinal needle in subjects undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgeries.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectlaparocopy, port site closure, fascial closure, vicryl, prolene, pain, surgical site infectionen_US
dc.titleComparison of absorbable multifilament suture (vicryltm) and non-absorbable monofilament suture (prolenetm) in laparoscopic port site closure using spinal needle - a hospital based randomised controlled trialen_US
dc.typeDissertationsen_US
Appears in Collections:General Surgery MS

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
BH0118010 Dr.Naren Mandalapu.pdf1.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.